With the onset and fast pace of globalization, global governance helps address issues that affect all countries regardless of borders. Antibiotic resistance is one such threat to the security of people all over the world.
Global policies are often used in advocacy initiatives to remind countries of their global commitment to antimicrobial resistance and to hold governments accountable to track progress towards managing these commitments.
The Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) are one set of global commitments that include 17 goals that affect all countries and for which global coordination and collaboration are necessary to achieve. It will be impossible to achieve these goals without addressing antimicrobial resistance. In 2019 a new indicator was added to the SDG framework specifically addressing resistance (Indicator 3.d.2: Reduce the percentage of bloodstream infections due to selected antimicrobial resistant organisms).
Antimicrobial resistance and antibiotic resistance
Antimicrobial resistance is a wide term that includes resistance in different microorganisms to their respective treatment: Antibiotics for bacterial infections including TB, antivirals for viral infections, antifungals for fungal infections and antiparasitic agents for parasite infections. Global discussions on antimicrobial resistance today are in fact often about antibiotic resistance, as this is the most urgent global risk requiring increased attention and global coordination.
Antimicrobial resistance global governance timeline
Recent global efforts to address antimicrobial resistance began in 1994 with scientific working groups convened by the World Health Organization (WHO). The WHO released the first global strategy on antimicrobial resistance in 2001. Global uptake was slow and fifteen years later, the WHO released the Global Action Plan on Antimicrobial Resistance. Also released in 2015, were Global Action Plans from the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) and the World Organisation of Animal Health (OIE). Together the three organizations are known as the Tripartite.
In 2016, Heads of States, during the United Nations General Assembly (UNGA), signed a political declaration on antimicrobial resistance committing to a broad multisectoral approach. That is, in agriculture, human and animal health – to strengthen regulation of antimicrobials, improve knowledge and awareness, promote best practices and to foster innovative approaches using new technologies in diagnostics and vaccines. This was only the fourth time in history that a health topic was discussed at the UNGA. Shortly thereafter, the UN Secretary General convened the Interagency Coordination Group (IACG) on Antimicrobial Resistance. The IACG submitted their recommendations to the UN Secretary General in April 2019.
The IACG on Antimicrobial Resistance were tasked with outlining a blueprint of how to tackle resistance. The IACG included stakeholders across the UN, international organizations and individuals with expertise in human, animal and plant health, as well as the food, animal feed, trade, development and environment sectors. On 29 April 2019, the IACG completed its mandate upon submission of its report to the Secretary-General. The report included recommendations around five central themes outlined in the box below.
Themes and main recommendations of the IACG
- Accelerating progress in countries: Member states need to accelerate their progress on development and implementation of AMR National Action Plans
- Innovating to secure the future: Intensify efforts to support research into the development of new antimicrobials, diagnostics, vaccines, waste management tools, and safe and effective alternatives to antimicrobials across the One Health spectrum with sustained investment and the aim of equitable access.
- Collaborating for more effective action: Strengthen the systematic engagement of civil society and the private sector to optimize their contributions to the response to antimicrobial resistance, including working with national governments.
- Investing for a sustainable response: Develop innovative approaches to mainstream antimicrobial resistance-related activities and leverage resources from existing funding streams, as well as to mobilize new and additional funding including domestic financing commitments by national governments.
- Strengthening accountability and global governance: Create a platform that will raise the profile and urgency of addressing antimicrobial resistance; build and maintain political momentum and public support;enable more comprehensive monitoring of the science and evidence related to antimicrobial resistance;ensure accountability among all stakeholders; and recognize the central role of national governments.
In response to the IACG recommendations, a Global Leaders Group on Antimicrobial Resistance has now been established. It had its inaugural meeting in January 2021 and includes members from Member States, civil society and the private sector.
|Global Leaders Group on Antimicrobial Resistance||Website of the Global Leaders Group. Lists current members and related documents such as current priorities and the Terms of Reference.|
|No Time to Wait: Securing the future from drug-resistant infections. Report to the Secretary-General of the United Nations||Report. Final report from the IACG on Antimicrobial Resistance. Contains five groups of recommendations for global action on antimicrobial resistance. Summary of recommendations and key messages, as well as more detailed IACG discussion papers can be accessed on the same page.|
|Global Action Plan on Antimicrobial Resistance||Global action plan adopted by the World Health Assembly in 2015. Outlines five objectives; improve awareness and understanding of antimicrobial resistance, strengthen the knowledge and evidence base, reduce the incidence of infection, optimize the use of antimicrobial medicines in human and animal health, and develop the economic case for sustainable investment.|
|When the Drugs Don’t Work – Antibiotic Resistance as a Global Development Problem (PDF 6,4MB)||Report from ReAct that describes the negative impact of antibiotic resistance on global and national efforts to eradicate poverty, spur economic growth, reduce inequality, improve global public health, reduce hunger and protect the environment (Sustainable development goals 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14 and 15).|
|Pulling Together to Beat Superbugs Knowledge And Implementation Gaps in Addressing Antimicrobial Resistance||Report from the World Bank which highlights the need to re-frame antimicrobial resistance (AMR) as a global development issue. Chapter 3 (p.47) describes key knowledge and implementation gaps (table 1, p. 48) that may stand in the way for effective action. It also contains a framework – based on the expected level of risks (table 3, p. 56) for AMR emergence and spread – that aims to guide countries to suitable interventions (figure 5, p 58; table 4, p. 59).
|Resetting the agenda for antibiotic resistance through a health systems perspective||Viewpoint from ReAct published in the Lancet Global health, arguing that a health system approach nationally and globally is critical to mitigate the devastating consequences of antibiotic resistance.|
|Briefing paper: Tackling Antibiotic Resistance for Greater Global Health Security (PDF)||Policy brief for Chatham House provides an overview of the problem and how it relates to global health security, and also discusses current initiatives and options for action.|
|Antimicrobial policy interventions in food animal production in South East Asia||Journal article that describes key policies for tackling antimicrobial resistance (in relation to food animal production) in the South East Asia Region (open access).|