Share the article

Monitoring and evaluation are integral parts of any awareness raising initiative. Results should be fed back to interested stakeholders in a timely manner and in a format that can be interpreted and used by the respective parties.

Feedback should encourage improvement and promote learning from experience without fear of negative consequences. Periodic evaluation is important to understand if goals are being accomplished and identify aspects that may need improvement. Evaluation also documents the impact of programs, which is helpful for the scale-up, and replication of interventions. The evaluation should include an analysis of both process and outcome indicators.

Monitoring and evaluation plan

The development of an evaluation plan is helpful in measuring the impact of awareness-raising initiatives. Often process and outcome measures are evaluated quantitatively however the collection of qualitative data can help give a comprehensive view of the extent to which changes are occurring. When developing an evaluation plan, teams should think about the following:

  • What to measure?
  • How to collect and record data?
  • Who will analyze and interpret the data?
  • How to feedback results to the different stakeholders?
  • Taking action on the results

Measurement and indicators

Process and outcome measures are essential parts of evaluation. The two types of measures give different perspectives on the situation and can be used to get a comprehensive view of the success of awareness raising initiatives. With publically reported measures there is a risk of focusing efforts on one aspect of the program and losing sight of others leading to ‘gaming’ of results. To counteract this, ensure ownership and long-term benefit, indicator development, evaluation, and feedback should be multidisciplinary, involve relevant stakeholders and should be done in a timely manner.

Process indicators:

Process measures give a view if improvements have been made in awareness and understanding.

Outcome indicators:

Outcome measures inform the degree to which awareness raising initiatives facilitate behavior change to reduce the spread of antibiotic resistance.

In MEASURE you can find tools and resources for measuring various aspects of antibiotic resistance and use (such as point prevalence survey protocols and knowledge, attitudes, beliefs and practices questionnaires).

Analyze results

The data collected during the measurement stage should be analyzed together with the key stakeholders. Involving others from outside can bring additional knowledge and understanding to what is happening in a particular group. By engaging them in the process, it can help them identify problems and take ownership of finding solutions. It is important to have dialogue and discussion in this stage so that everyone can understand the meaning of the results. Where there seems to be a trend towards progress, teams should consider continuing and scaling up interventions. Where there is no indication of change or improvement, teams should discuss possible explanations and decide if changes need to be made to the program.

Communicate results and provide feedback

Feedback on the impact of awareness-raising initiatives should be given in a timely manner to collaborating partners and interested stakeholders, especially management if applicable. A strategy should be developed for communicating the results. Reporting should be transparent to promote confidence in the intervention. Feedback should be in a format that can be interpreted and used by the relevant stakeholders. Communication methods and content can differ between groups and should be tailored to the audience. Positive progress should be acknowledged and public recognition should be made of the contributions and successes of all partners involved in the project.  Affirmation of hard work will provide incentive for staff to continually improve and be involved in the process.

Selected Resources

Resource Description
Handwashing Promotion Monitoring and Evaluation Module Toolkit developed by UNICEF useful when implementing a handwashing program. It also includes which steps to take when evaluating the behavior change program.

More from "Set up a campaign"

1.
Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Healthcare. The OSSIE toolkit for the implementation of the Australian guidelines for the prevention of Infection in Health Care 2010. (2010).
1.
UNICEF. Handwashing Promotion Monitoring and Evaluation Module. (2015).
1.
Pulcini, C. & Gyssens, I. C. How to educate prescribers in antimicrobial stewardship practices. Virulence 4, 192–202 (2013).
1.
Nathwani, D., Gray, K. & Borland, H. Quality indicators for antibiotic control programmes. J. Hosp. Infect. 50, 165–169 (2002).
1.
Cruickshank, M. & Duguid, M. Antimicrobial stewardship in Australian hospitals 2011. (Australian Commission on Safety & Quality in Health Care, 2011).
1.
Pitches, D., Burls, A. & Fry-Smith, A. How to make a silk purse from a sow’s ear--a comprehensive review of strategies to optimise data for corrupt managers and incompetent clinicians. BMJ 327, 1436–1439 (2003).