A survey on the currently developed National Action Plans on AMR highlighted suboptimal financing plans and lack of resources.On October 13, the World Health Organization therefore launched a new tool to help guide the development and implementation of National Action Plans on AMR.
This article looks at three areas of added value of this new tool. The new WHO tool can also be accessed through the ReAct toolbox - a repository intended to support governments to develop and implement National Action Plans on AMR.
6 years after the adoption of the Global Action Plan on AMR back in 2015, a recent WHO analysis estimated that only around 40% of the 145 countries that developed a NAP, had a budgeted operational plan, and even less (just around 20%) were in fact fully funded. This lack of financing of implementation and action at national level showed the need for a tool that could guide countries towards costing and budgeting their AMR activities.
This should be done for example by:
- quantifying and prioritizing AMR-related activities
- identifying the available resources and the financial gaps
- advocating for additional funding, and
- developing multi-stakeholder partnerships
1. Improving use of resources
The tool is not only intended to support budgeting unfunded activities, it is also designed to help identify national and/or international financing that might already cover or be relevant for AMR activities. Such analysis may be particularly important for countries with health budgets hit hard by responding to covid19. The User Guide of the costing and budgeting tool is intended to make it possible to identify AMR-related financial gaps already at a planning stage. This should help to avoid overlaps between multiple (and sometime scarce) resources. As of now, Indonesia and Turkey have participated in the scoping phase of the project and four countries were engaged in the pilot phase (Jamaica, Paraguay, Sierra Leone and Somalia). One of the countries reported “The WHO costing and budgeting tool will be useful for sharing information across sectors and improving coordination of resource allocation and use“. However, piloting, experience sharing, and feedback from more countries and different governance models will be important in identifying potential shortcomings and/or broader application of the tool.
2. Taking a realistic approach
One of the key points of the tool is to turn plans into action and support countries in moving from plans on paper to actual implementation.
“One of the lessons learned from the pilot studies is when developing a National Action Plan on AMR, it is crucial to be less aspirational and more realistic”.
Stated by the WHO Program Officer Dr. Alessandro Patriarchi during the inauguration webinar of the tool.
By quantifying activities and mapping related costs, the costing and budgeting tool intends to help the avoidance of unexpected overheads and mid-term deadlocks during implementation of National Action Plans. According to the feedback from the case study countries, the tool was perceived as being comprehensive, pragmatic and user-friendly toward this end. More specifically, both Turkey and Indonesia found that the development of a detailed implementation plan (for example by costing main- as well as sub-activities) was conducive towards a realistic and specific costing process.
3. Encourages multi-lateral collaborations
In order to achieve “One Health” collaboration on National Action Plans development and implementation, multiple ministries as well as relevant stakeholders across sectors are called on to collaborate throughout the budgeting process. Feedback from countries noted that “Development of a costed plan leads to greater multi-sectoral stakeholder involvement” and that “…The costing exercise was viewed as a significant step in bringing sectors together to join efforts in addressing AMR”. As such it seems that the costing and budgeting tool may be useful in facilitating the dialogue between the relevant parties, and strengthen “One-health” efforts and collaboration.
Concluding, the WHO Costing and Budgeting tool has the potential to guide countries in developing a detailed and realistic NAP, optimizing the use of the resources and addressing the financial gaps. The latter represents one of the useful resources available within ReAct Toolbox, a repository on antibiotic resistance that includes all relevant tools for developing and/or implementing your country’s National Action Plan on AMR.
ReAct Toolbox: All you need to know – National Action Plans on AMR
If you are looking for additional tools to develop or implement your country’s National Action Plan on AMR – the ReAct Toolbox might be a useful resource.
Policy section – develop and implement a National Action Plan on AMR
For example, the policy section in the ReAct Toolbox contains tools to help develop and implement a National Action Plan on AMR – this in a 5-step approach:
- engage stakeholders
- access the situation
- finalizing the plan
- elements of a plan
- evaluate progress
You also find guidance on implementation of specific elements that are often part of a National Action Plan – including links to tools on surveillance, stewardship and infection prevention & control.
More about the ReAct Toolbox – six focus areas for action on antibiotic resistance
The ReAct Toolbox is a repository on antibiotic resistance that includes six focus areas:
More news and opinion
- Staff interview Maria Pränting
- 5 lessons learned from Latin American Summit: Community empowerment – vital for tackling AMR
- The WHA74 Special Session on Pandemic Preparedness and Response – an opportunity to address antibiotic resistance
- ReAct announces the top 15 teams to participate in the online global design sprint Innovate4Health 2021
- City of Hyderabad joins ‘Go Blue’ campaign as part of WAAW Activities
- ReAct Europe and Uppsala University go blue to shed light on the antibiotic resistance issue
- Could the best chemotherapy be an antimicrobial drug?
- Press release: Unique collaboration between Ministry of Health, Zambia and ReAct Africa
- Mobilizing communities to act on antibiotic resistance
- ReAct activities for World Antimicrobial Awareness Week 2021
- Dr Vijay Yeldandi
- 4-day Summit: Latin America discusses the role of the community in National Action Plans on AMR
- The world needs new antibiotics – so why aren’t they developed?
- 3 ways the new WHO costing & budgeting tool supports AMR National Action Plan work
- 5 years after the UN Political Declaration on AMR – where are we now?
- Víctor Orellana
- Local production of vaccines and medicines in focus: Key points from ReAct and South Center UN HLPF side-event
- Behavior change to manage antimicrobial resistance: 8 briefs and 1 webinar-launch by Uppsala Health Summit
- ReAct and ICARS to develop policy guides and tools for low resource settings
- Tapiwa Kujinga, Director of PATAM: In Zimbabwe civil society is involved in every aspect of the response to AMR
- COVID-19: India pays a high price for indiscriminate drug use
- Lancet Global Health article release: Resetting the agenda for antibiotic resistance
- 3 key takeaways for AMR from this year’s World Health Assembly WHA74
- Antibiotic resistance – far more than a medical problem
- UN High-level Dialogue on AMR: political will and investments needed
- Resetting the agenda for antibiotic resistance through a health systems perspective
- 3 questions to newly appointed STAG-AMR members Otridah Kapona and Sujith Chandy
- Walk the talk: time is ticking for all to act on antibiotic resistance!
- Vanessa Carter: 3 years of surviving a drug-resistant infection made me want to create change
- Upcoming ReAct Webinar: Expert Conversation about new report
- New ReAct report: Governments need to take more leadership to ensure global sustainable access to effective antibiotics
- 4 considerations for addressing antimicrobial resistance through pandemic preparedness
- Preventing the next pandemic: Addressing antibiotic resistance
- 4 key takeaways from the virtual ReAct Africa Conference 2020
- The threat of the unknown: is lack of global burden data slowing down work on antibiotic resistance?
- ReAct input to the WHO Executive Board Session on Antimicrobial Resistance
- Dr Gautham: informal health providers key to reducing antibiotic use in rural India