News and Opinions  –  2026

From dialogue to progress: Strengthening global AMR governance

Share the article

2026-05-20

Antibiotic resistance is a global catastrophic risk already causing over 1.1 million deaths annually and threatening global health and economic development. ReAct’s latest policy brief, From Dialogue to Progress, argues that while the global governance architecture has expanded, the current system remains fragmented with unclear mandates, funding shortages, and significant accountability gaps.

Cover of ReAct policy brief on AMR Ministerial meetings.
Cover of the ReAct Policy Brief: From dialogue to progress: Evolving the role of Ministerial Meetings in the Global AMR governance system. Click image to download. Photo: Shutterstock.

Ahead of the fifth Global High-Level Ministerial Conference on AMR convening in Abuja, this ReAct brief takes stock of the ministerial meeting mechanism as a distinct and increasingly significant element of the global AMR governance architecture.

This brief focuses specifically on how the ministerial process has evolved, what previous meetings have delivered, and how it can be further institutionalized to strengthen accountability and continuity.

It also draws on lessons from the history of AMR ministerial meetings since 2014 as well as comparative experiences from other global health and development areas.

To translate these commitments into national action, ReAct recommends the following strategic approaches, structured according to the core priorities for evolving the ministerial platform:

1. Formalizing the Ministerial Meetings

The platform should be transitioned into a continuous governance mechanism by defining clear roles for the rotating “Troika” system to ensure structural continuity. This includes establishing a framework for biennial ministerial stocktaking to conduct structured reviews of global progress and facilitating the operationalization of a robust accountability framework that complements voluntary self-assessments with more objective, transparent review processes.

2. Connecting to the existing and emerging governance architecture

Ministerial processes must be integrated with the broader system by clarifying relationships with other entities. Deliberations should be informed by evidence from the IPEA, and the MSPP should be formally mandated to facilitate multi-stakeholder consultations between meetings to maintain momentum and align political discussions with implementation.

3. Institutionalizing regional governance

A formal regional tier should be embedded into the governance cycle between global meetings. This would serve to sustain political momentum, deepen ownership among Low- and Middle-Income Countries (LMICs), and ensure that structured regional inputs systematically feed into global agendas.

4. Integrating a convening of funders for AMR acceleration

The platform should be leveraged to convene international funders, including development banks and bilateral donors, to coordinate resources. This is essential to better align financing with country needs and to advance toward the USD 100 million catalytic target for the AMR Multi-Partner Trust Fund.

Ultimately, AMR should be reframed as a systemic development challenge integrated within the wider global health architecture. The outcome of the Abuja Ministerial Meeting, and what happens in the following years, will shape not only the trajectory of the AMR response, but will likely also influence the evolution of the broader multilateral governance system for complex cross-sectoral development challenges. Addressing AMR effectively requires the kind of sustained, coordinated and inclusive global health and development governance architecture that the international community has long struggled to establish. Strengthening the ministerial meeting mechanism is one important part of that effort – and of the wider challenge of ensuring that global health governance can evolve to meet increasingly interconnected risks.

More from "2026"